The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English , in 2000 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts compare the percentage of British learners who managed to speak other languages more than English in 2000 and 2010.
Overall, as is observed from the illustrations, vast number of students in both years were not able to communicate in other languages, but in English.
According to the given charts, in 2000, 30% of all students spoke just English and then these monolinguals increased slightly by 5% to 35% in 2010. Disregarding English, French and Spanish considered to be dominant languages among this particular institution in 2000, accounting for 15% and 20% respectively. These figures changed moderately in 2010.The number of those who spoke Germany rocketed from 10% (2000) to 15% in 2010.Also Spanish speaking dropped by 10%, reaching its lowest point at 10%.
Other languages except all mentioned above by which pupils were able to talk constituted 10% in 2000 followed by 10% rise in 2010.In addition, the number of those students speaking three languages improved from 10% to 15
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...hese figures changed moderately in 2010.The number of those who spoke Germany rocke...
^^^
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Also
...y rocketed from 10% 2000 to 15% in 2010.Also Spanish speaking dropped by 10%, reachi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...y rocketed from 10% 2000 to 15% in 2010.Also Spanish speaking dropped by 10%, reachi...
^^^^
Line 4, column 130, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...0% in 2000 followed by 10% rise in 2010.In addition, the number of those students ...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'regarding', 'so', 'then', 'in addition']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.221052631579 0.268076937826 82% => OK
Verbs: 0.136842105263 0.116061578633 118% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0894736842105 0.0759168565197 118% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0315789473684 0.0366838410393 86% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00526315789474 0.0131127313244 40% => OK
Prepositions: 0.157894736842 0.155750635184 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0631578947368 0.0379272487307 167% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.80929530224 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0421052631579 0.0210936926555 200% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0684210526316 0.0948980150116 72% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0157894736842 0.00967000014798 163% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1007.0 1161.00487805 87% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.9 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.14024390244 5.90752243213 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73763899035 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.365853658537 0.337110787985 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.317073170732 0.247514529752 128% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.237804878049 0.171178102325 139% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.134146341463 0.112407865282 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80929530224 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634146341463 0.546246751206 116% => OK
Word variations: 59.6157440485 49.3433353143 121% => OK
How many sentences: 6.0 8.93414634146 67% => OK
Sentence length: 27.3333333333 23.0094962315 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0846465797 42.9750493124 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.833333333 135.714022679 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 23.0094962315 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.689975730869 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.48048780488 270% => OK
Readability: 59.0406504065 47.7609492067 124% => OK
Elegance: 2.54545454545 2.94281807926 86% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.550245331647 0.418131533498 132% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.203977999849 0.181151798455 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.123586178811 0.0850326197045 145% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.815786433471 0.706616315825 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.191746987275 0.157042692854 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.330654683435 0.228904883108 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934843906652 0.108899403657 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.322774804252 0.367819155151 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0974795894686 0.0812612215331 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.391053268659 0.316326947829 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648237772352 0.0921553760075 70% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70731707317 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.08536585366 24% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.16585365854 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.02926829268 33% => OK
Total topic words: 5.0 7.1512195122 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.