Given are two pie chart which illustrate information about how many students of one university had mastered other language beside English, in 2000 and 2010.
In general, we can see that the percentage of French speaking students, along with students who did not master other languages was decrease. Meanwhile, students spoke Spanish only, another language and two other languages had their percentages increased. Their prospective percentages were 30%, 10%, 15% in 2000. And then they decreased to 35%, 20%, 15% prospectively in 2010.
To begin with, the pie charts depict that students cared more about mastering another language beside English when the percentages of student spoke only English was 20% in 2000. Then it decreased to 10% in 2010. The interesting point is percentage of students speaking German. It still remained 10% from 2000 to 2010. In addition, the largest speaking foreign language students was Spanish in 2000 with 30% and kept the position in 2010 with 35%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are two pie chart which illustrate informat...
^^^
Line 1, column 19, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'chart' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
Given are two pie chart which illustrate information about how ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
still, then, while, in addition, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 829.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24683544304 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64348685504 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594936708861 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.1293191485 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340872689526 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133456895848 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777764087829 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255775961816 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519157871059 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.