The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.
The given two pie charts provide information about five reasons for getting work by bicycle and car in particular for both vehicles in percentage.
An overview of the pie charts, the largest proportion of people who cycle have made this choice based on health and environmental reasons while almost the same percentage of people choosing car due to comfort and distance to work reasons.
It can be seen from pie charts that 60% of people choose a bicycle for health and environmental reasons as it causes less pollutions. Moreover, nearly the same percentage pick car because of comfort and distance to work. A quarter of people prefer bicycles due to speed and absence of costs as the same percentage choose a car for safety and opportunity not to carry things to work. Finally, less than a fifth of people based on reasons of lacking the parking problems when choosing to travel to work by bicycle what is nearly the same as the proportion for people who value speed reasons choosing to travel by car.
- The chart below gives information on the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 84
- Some people believe that countries with strong economy should help emerging nations Discuss the advantage and disadvantage of giving international aid to poor countries 78
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In order to be successful in sport some people think you have to be physically strong Others say that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion Give reason for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own kn 84
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think it is fully justified while others think it is unfair Discus both these views and give your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun pollutions is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... and environmental reasons as it causes less pollutions. Moreover, nearly the same p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, moreover, so, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79310344828 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57291603984 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.9351462406 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365658653624 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196837616918 0.103423049105 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633784187493 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245122845891 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768907706102 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.