The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996.
The pie charts given illustrate differences in the expenditure on distinct items during the 30-year period from 1966 to 1996 in the U.S.
it is evident that food represented the largest percentage of expense, whereas computers’ share was the lowest. Besides, in 1996 , the spending on cars made up the highest portion, while the opposite was true of books.
As can be seen from the first pie chart, the proportion of food was the largest with nearly a half, compared to that of cars and petrol with merely a quarter and 1 in 10. 7%, 10% and 6% were reported for restaurants, furniture and books, respectively. Computers contributed a minimal share, with only 1%.
According to the second chart, in 1996, the percentage of cars ranked first, with nearly 5 in 10. The figure for petrol and restaurant was recorded with 8% and 14%. The share of books was 14%, which was also 2% higher than that of computers and 4% higher than funiture’s statistic. The figure for book was just 1% only.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 134, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...; share was the lowest. Besides, in 1996 , the spending on cars made up the highes...
^^
Line 4, column 287, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... higher than funiture's statistic. The figure for book was just 1% only.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76878612717 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77390997732 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606936416185 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 63.3908121239 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6666666667 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0988132195029 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040274867568 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496549732367 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729392865044 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474529965774 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.