The bar graphs illustrates the proportion of undergraduate and postgraduate pupils who did not opt to go into full-time work after finishing college studies. The figures are given for the year 2008.
Overall, it is clearly seen that, majority of the graduate and postgraduate students went for higher studies after leaving college. Furthermore, it can be seen that, the number of students who went for voluntary works after college was low compared to the others.
Firstly, in 2008, almost 30000 undergraduate students went for higher studies after leaving college, while for postgraduate students this figure was lower, at around 2800. Just above 2500 postgraduate students opted for part-time jobs, whereas, in graduates this figure was higher, at around 17800.
Seconldy, around 1600 postgraduate students were unemployed during the period, however; interestingly, in the case of graduate students there was tenfold increase in this figure. Finally, about 350 postgraduates opted for voluntary work after leaving college, whereas, for graduates this figure was higher, at around 3500.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'illustrate'.
Suggestion: illustrate
The bar graphs illustrates the proportion of undergraduate and pos...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64848484848 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82446351066 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569696969697 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0466524818 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230658201509 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122313550127 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694936533706 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170607299825 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653124126015 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.