The charts below show that what UK graduate and postgraduates students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008

The information about the students who are graduate and postgraduate in the United Kingdom and not work in any full-time jobs in 2008 is depicted by the rendered bar charts. The data has been calibrated in the number of students.

To begin with, 17735 graduate students preferred part-time jobs. However, the proportion of pupils who were continue studying, which was 29665 students. There were 16235 graduate students who did not find any jobs. Moreover, only 3500 students after completing college they were doing some voluntary work.

Moving towards, the number of pupils who were working in part-time jobs and who were doing further studies, it accounted for 2535 and 2725 respectively. In 2008, only 345 people were participating in any kinds of voluntary work after graduation. However, there were 1625 students who could not able to find any jobs in the UK.

To sum up, it can be vividly manifested that the most pupils preferred to doing further study who were postgraduate or graduates. In contrast, fewer students were interested in voluntary work.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'continued'.
Suggestion: continued
...ever, the proportion of pupils who were continue studying, which was 29665 students. The...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, in contrast, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17341040462 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69030282546 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560693641618 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6804748088 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3636363636 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7272727273 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269633566974 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111356849568 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710151084299 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174394042435 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545968043632 0.0819641961636 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.