The information about the students who are graduate and postgraduate in the United Kingdom and not work in any full-time jobs in 2008 is depicted by the rendered bar charts. The data has been calibrated in the number of students.
To begin with, 17735 graduate students preferred half-time jobs. However, the proportion of pupils who were continue studying, which was 29665 students. There were 16235 graduate students who were jobless. Moreover, only 3500 students after completing college they were doing some voluntary activities.
Moving towards, the number of pupils who were working in temporary jobs and who were doing advance studies, it accounted for 2535 and 2725 respectively. In 2008, only 345 people were participating in any kinds of charity work after graduation. However, there were 1625 students who could not able to find any jobs in the UK.
To sum up, it can be vividly manifested that the most pupils preferred to doing further study who were postgraduate or graduates. In contrast, fewer students were interested in voluntary service.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'continued'.
Suggestion: continued
...ever, the proportion of pupils who were continue studying, which was 29665 students. The...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, in contrast, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27058823529 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74097449395 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594117647059 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2736989728 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4545454545 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4545454545 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220716629475 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923911388589 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636029884953 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146457534251 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534722996185 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.