The charts below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010.
The graph explain the progress of the three countries by 2007 and 2010. The GDP in Tunisia in year of 2007 was the highest percentage while after 4 years growth Japan leading in the first position.
In other hand, Japan shows the increasing of the GDP year by year that proof stabilize of the economic. In the beginning of 2007 to 2008, progressing of economic was gradually increased approximately 2,2% that followed by 2009 to 2010 graphs, the progress was increased around 1.3%. Therefore, only the year of 2008 to 2009 was increased under 1,5%.
In other hand, Tunisia was the greatest GDP in year of 2007, however the percentages in 4 years was decreased slightly year by year to 3%. Between 2007 to 2009, there was gradually falled around 1.8% that affected the economy of Tunisia.
Therefore, Ecuador illustrate the fluctuated of the percentage in year of 2007 and 2010. From 2007 to 2008 that was risen about 1.7% it seems that the economic was good but in year of 2008 to 2009 the economic was not stabilize which is it shows in graph dramatic declined around 3.7%. In addition, in 2010 the economic was better to 2.3%, although is not enough to return back to the begin position in the year of 2007.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'explains'.
Suggestion: explains
The graph explain the progress of the three countries by ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 20, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Ecuador) must be used with a third-person verb: 'illustrates'.
Suggestion: illustrates
...my of Tunisia. Therefore, Ecuador illustrate the fluctuated of the percentage in yea...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 219, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'stabilized'.
Suggestion: stabilized
...ar of 2008 to 2009 the economic was not stabilize which is it shows in graph dramatic dec...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 367, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
...tter to 2.3%, although is not enough to return back to the begin position in the year of 20...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 382, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...lthough is not enough to return back to the begin position in the year of 2007.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, therefore, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6976744186 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46930753831 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451162790698 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9854852356 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280692469393 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146224487753 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068740689199 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211068510671 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735545268943 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.