The charts below shows the result of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
The above line graph gives information about the Australian citizens’ routines of purchasing and drinking both coffee and tea in diverse towns in last 4 weeks which was obtained from one questionnaire’s outcomes.
Overall, it is clear that in all cities, the amount of people who have gone to café in order to drink coffee or tea were higher than others, except Adelaide where the greater numbers were allocated to whom bought instant coffee.
In Sydney, more than 60% of residents were interested in going to café in the last 4 weeks, meanwhile approximately average 45% bought fresh or instant coffee. The other city, Melbourne, similarly people tended to drink their coffee in coffee shops which was the highest percentage on the whole graph with near 65%.
Brisbane witnessed the fewer number of people who went to café with less than 35%. On the other hand, buying instant coffee by their residents had a noticeable increase to almost 53%. As it was mentioned, only in Adelaide, people were fond of buying instant coffee more than drinking it in café with a slight difference of 1 percent with near 50%. In the last town, Hobart, the records were roughly like Sydney, but with some alterations such as steady increase in statistic of buying instant coffee to near 55%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, so, while, such as, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93087557604 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55317838603 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576036866359 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.734455972 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.75 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.125 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185402590106 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857626772854 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046944393232 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118293446424 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234715192762 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.