The charts below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main

The bar chart depicts the value of nations' exports in five different categories in 2015 and 2016. The bar chart is supported by table which describes percentage change during two years in every export category. Overall, it can be seen that Petroleum products contributed the most to country's export during 2015 and 2016, while Textiles contributed the least. Moreover, Textiles experienced biggest percentage change while Agricultural products experienced the smallest.

Petroleum products contributed the most to the export income with approximately $61 billion in 2015 and $64 billion in 2016, after experienced 3% increase. Following Petroleum products was Engineered goods, which supported the export earnings with around $55 billion in 2016, before increased 8.5% to about $62.5 billion in 2016.

On the third place was Gems and jewellery which contributed with approximately $42 billion in 2015 before dropped to around $40 billion in 2016. Gems and jewellery is followed by Agricultural products on the fourth place with approximately $31 billion, before rose to around $32 billion. Compared to other categories, this category has the smallest change at 0.81%. On the last position was Textiles, which stood at about $25 billion in 2015, before increased to approximately $40 billion in 2016. Among all categories, Textiles experienced the biggest percentage change at 15.24%.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 379, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'experienced the biggest'.
Suggestion: experienced the biggest
...ntributed the least. Moreover, Textiles experienced biggest percentage change while Agricultural pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ith approximately 1 billion, before rose to around 2 billion. Compared to other c...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, third, well, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49289099526 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98362217829 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478672985782 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1536516135 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.363636364 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27765898894 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130334498236 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081903960607 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212421028788 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.08451920555 0.0819641961636 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.