The charts below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Take a glance at given figures, while the bar graph obviously denotes the worth of one nation's export in divergent classification such as petroleum products, engineered goods and other goods in billion dollar in a two-year period, the table reveals a comparison of converting percentage of individual classification from 2016 to 2015.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is evident from the information supplied that in first graph exporting petroleum products had a good value of just over 60 billion dollars in these two years.nevertheless, textiles' transporting had a poor value for this country at about under and over 30 billions dollars in 2015 and 2016 respectively among all the products along with goods. It is also worthy to note from the second diagram that the worth of all exported goods besides products except one of them which were gems and jewellery have climbed from 2015 to 2016.
As is illustrated by the bar chart the highest amount of money were directly earned out of both transporting petroleum products besides engineered goods at the worth of about 60 billion dollars,whereas the lowest amount of money have earned by exporting agriculture products along with textiles at about 30 billion dollars in these two years.
As can be seen from the table, it is apparent from the data supplied that petroleum products besides agriculture products holded its value over these two years so as just had a slight increase at 3 and 0.18 percent respectively.despite the fact that the textiles along with engineered goods had a significant growth in value at 15.24 and 8.5 percent respectively, gems and jewellery saw a noticeable drop by 5.18 percent in their worth in a period of two years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...ts, engineered goods and other goods in billion dollar in a two-year period, the table ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dual classification from 2016 to 2015. Looking from the overall perspective, it...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ellery have climbed from 2015 to 2016. As is illustrated by the bar chart the ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... As is illustrated by the bar chart the highest amount of money were directl...
^^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...unt of money were directly earned out of both transporting petroleum products be...
^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...irectly earned out of both transporting petroleum products besides engineered go...
^^
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ngineered goods at the worth of about 60 billion dollars,whereas the lowest amoun...
^^
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , whereas
...t the worth of about 60 billion dollars,whereas the lowest amount of money have earned ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...30 billion dollars in these two years. As can be seen from the table, it is app...
^^^^
Line 4, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...just had a slight increase at 3 and 0.18 percent respectively.despite the fact th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, look, nevertheless, second, so, well, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 965.302439024 149% => OK
No of words: 283.0 196.424390244 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06713780919 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03720884871 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491166077739 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 424.8 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 56.0 22.4926829268 249% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.6915652087 43.030603864 211% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 286.8 112.824112599 254% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 56.6 22.9334400587 247% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 17.4 5.23603664747 332% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138338968189 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935919434366 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464562597027 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931602633019 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576907522986 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 30.7 13.2329268293 232% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 23.1 61.2550243902 38% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.51609756098 224% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 24.0 10.3012195122 233% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 29.0 11.4329268293 254% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 24.4 10.9970731707 222% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 24.0 11.0658536585 217% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.