It is broadly thought that government supposed to pass some strict laws for people to recycle the un-wanted materials, which are produced in a high number, owing to the worrisome fact that we, people, unfortunately are not really attentive to recycle litter. In other words, wastes are usually got rid of in a careless way by majority of people. I side with this assertion due to the truism which is human do not really take recycling serious as we are not really standing on a conscious zone about how ignoring this significant subject can put us in a deep trouble era.
To commence with let me highlight the process "recycling" which is really vital to guard our ecosystem from any potential dangers. This process considered as an optional activity for people to perform, to be more specific a host number of people, excluding alert environmentalists, find it both time and labor- consuming to follow every day. Though, quite the opposite, my impression is that we are required to do this process as our daily basis tasks. To clear up the reasons, I can obviously mention the insufficient capacity of earth for keeping our all wastes, hence for resuming our life in a safe, clean area with standard quality of living we must rethink about our production of unwanted materials.to broaden my view point I would add that these materials can be reused, re purposed and definitely recycled easily by people if they just allocate specific time of their days to this invaluable process.
As most people procrastinate doing this process and categorize it as a valueless task to do, I am totally convinced that some external forces ought to be implemented by some powerful systems to make people recycle their trashy materials every day. To put it more simply recycling waste items at home by people should be deemed as a fixed rule to follow by governments in every country due the fact that people are not really able to picture our remote environment without recycling. More over, to strength this law governments can imposed a specific amount of penalty if someone won't follow it. This effective and at the same time beneficial regulation would benefit every member of society in first place and allow them to have a more non pollutant area.
By way of conclusion, in most cases, individuals are not found on the way recycling their unused materials, therefore for escaping from this discomforting alongside undesirable zone, it seems to me more logical if responsible governments can take a productive action in order to iron out this issue, which is made some people concerned.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is broadly thought that government su...
^^^
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careless way" with adverb for "careless"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...er words, wastes are usually got rid of in a careless way by majority of people. I side with this...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ject can put us in a deep trouble era. To commence with let me highlight the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eir days to this invaluable process. As most people procrastinate doing this ...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m to have a more non pollutant area. By way of conclusion, in most cases, ind...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, really, so, therefore, in most cases, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 24.0651302605 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2161.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 437.0 315.596192385 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94508009153 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8656793605 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567505720824 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.2975951904 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.319900425 49.4020404114 205% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 180.083333333 106.682146367 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.4166666667 20.7667163134 175% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293688824137 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108235625089 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699759760878 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187972397128 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468287043394 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.1190380762 162% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.