The charts below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main

Essay topics:

The charts below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given bar chart depicts the earning of a country by exporting various goods in $ billions value in 2015 and 2016, while, the table outlines the exact change value in percentage.

To begin with, petroleum product was the highest exporting product of a country in both year, which was recorded $60 billions and $63 billions in 2015 and 2016 respectively. It shows 3% exceed in export earning in 2016 in petroleum product. Similarly, another highest exporting product was engineering goods, which increase it supplies to next country by +8.5%. This is the second highest earning product in 2016. Furthermore, the only product that decrease its export in 2016 was gems and jewelry. In 2015 the export was roughly $43 billions, but it was around $40 billions in 2016, which is -5.18% changes in actual percentage.

Moreover, agricultural product had made significant positive changes by +0.18%. However, textiles made a record of second highest value earning goods in 2016, which was +15.24%, by exporting around $5 billions more in 2016 comparison to 2015.

Overall, as the bar chart describes, all products and goods had rose its export in 2016 comparison to 2015 expect gems and jewelry and table shows that, textile was the highest earning goods in 2016.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is is the second highest earning product in 2016. Furthermore, the only product t...
^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., which was +15.24%, by exporting around billions more in 2016 comparison to 2015...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, similarly, so, while, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1051.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10194174757 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61912390516 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470873786408 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3825880245 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.1 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302733962799 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154937937178 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802231217124 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228415630932 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494326519467 0.0819641961636 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.