The bar chart illustrate information about the compare s export earning in billions of dollars from five kinds of product categories in the year between 2015 and 2016, while the table represents the changes in percentages of products values in the year from 2015 to 2016.
Overall, it can be seen that the petroleum product was highest amount of earning from exports. Secondly, the engineered goods was highest amount of earning from exports. The textile was highest percentage of product's values.
To begin with, it can be seen that the year in 2016, petroleum product was highest expect earning at about 62 billion dollars. The year in 2015, textiles products were the same expect earning at about 31 billion dollars. The unique thing is that the year in 2016, gems and jewelry product was dropping export earning at around 40 billion dollars but other four product was rising export earning. However, the textiles marked highest percentage of product's values at around 15.24%. The agriculture product marked lowest percentage of values at about 0.81%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
... can be seen that the petroleum product was highest amount of earning from exports. Secondl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of earning from exports. Secondly, the engineered goods was highest amount of e...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
...rts. Secondly, the engineered goods was highest amount of earning from exports. The tex...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
...nt of earning from exports. The textile was highest percentage of products values. To b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'product' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'products'.
Suggestion: products
...round 40 billion dollars but other four product was rising export earning. However, the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 419, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'marked the highest'.
Suggestion: marked the highest
...g export earning. However, the textiles marked highest percentage of products values at around...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, second, secondly, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13294797688 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42541864805 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468208092486 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 63.7497034609 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6666666667 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170206855357 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076511984751 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948372511023 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150057251037 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134003075142 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.