The graph illustrates the pattern in the incomes in 5 different fields of a nation's exports between 2015 and 2016, whose shifts were identified by the table including specific proportions for each object in the same period.
Overall, Petroleum and engineered categories were the two most dominant sectors in the nation’s earnings. It is also apparent in the table that textiles was the one to witness a noticeable growth in its value, while petroleum and agricultural products remained unchanged.
Regarding petroleum products, in 2015, it contributed the highest amount of income at 60 billion dollars, before rising minimal to approximately 63 billion dollars which was calculated at 3% development. Such similarities can be seen in terms of engineered goods, starting at around 58 billion dollars, the figure soon went up to 63 billion dollars being equal with the former one at the same year. 8.5% was recorded as the rate for its change in values from 2015 to 2016.
In terms of the changes in gems and jewellery and textiles categories, while the former declined 5.18% , the former saw a threefold increase at 15.24%, particularly from 41 billion dollars to 40 billion and 25 billion to 31 billion dollars respectively. Agricultural products’ earning is nearly flat at 31 billion dollars which was observed at 0.81% of growth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...egories, while the former declined 5.18% , the former saw a threefold increase at ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1130.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20737327189 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90751879037 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608294930876 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.6505448424 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.25 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.125 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120844823696 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646743888074 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655107436326 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0817110021059 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539577969583 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.