With the development of social media,public debate has been going on over whether those achievements should be accessible for everybody or not. In this essay, I would scrutinize both opinions before giving my final thought.
One the one hand, a school of thought believes that we should restrict the availability of some scientific comeouts due to some factors. The chief rationale is that before accomplishing any desired experimental result, a bulk of money and equipment is required. For example, paying all the staffs’ salaries or the electrical bills could be of paramount burden for several organizations to carry on day by day, let alone of the price to conduct a scientific report which lasted for a long time. A little extra charge, therefore, could be a small share with those arduous difficulties that experimenters have to face with.
On the other hand, many people think that all existing knowledge in the world should be opened to everyone. In fact, education is a part of human’s rights, people are allowed to learn what they want to. Consequently, for granted, if only the wealthy could only access a special knowledge, it would possibly lengthen the gap between the two classes of people in the society in both social status and educational foundation. This is the testament to the reason widely approachable knowledge should be given with the aim of strengthening communities.
However, while the latter idea seems similar to my own perception, I think that result is deemed to be questionable at best. This is due to the fact that there could be some going-on experiments or false datas if we let everything be reachable through the Internet. To some extent, it could lead to unexpected impacts because of misunderstanding among a group of citizens. Some of them could even voice their disappointment and anger towards the government and academics which threaten our social security. In order to eliminate such scenarios, I strongly believe that before being published, all the information should be expertized by the official authority’s group.
In conclusion, while people may vary in their opinions, I think people have the right to take access to useful information which was guaranteed by specialists.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , public
With the development of social media,public debate has been going on over whether t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...acts because of misunderstanding among a group of citizens. Some of them could ev...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18732782369 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02200968819 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595041322314 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2168948764 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.6875 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6875 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197111951364 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05808197461 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397776378642 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0957641776462 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341152391766 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.