The charts give data on the proportion of time and the places people of different age groups in the country of Fantasia spend and go for information on a weekly basis.
The three pie charts represent how youngsters, middle-aged people and retirees in Fantasia obtain their information every week.
Overall, it is clear that the two younger age groups favour Internet as a means of informing themselves. Meanwhile, televisions prove to be significantly more popular among retired people as a means of obtaining information compared to the other two age brackets.
Looking at the first two pie charts more closely, one can see that both age groups get their information from the Internet most often, at 56% of the time for youngsters and two-fifth for middle-aged people. TV recorded a figure of 16% in both cases, whereas printed media was the second most popular way of extracting information among middle-aged people, at 20%, and the third most common for young people, at only 13%. Youngsters rely on other media formats 15% of the time, and the corresponding figure for the middle-aged in 24%.
As for the final pie chart, it is evident that at a rate of 38%, TV was twice as often used by retired people to obtain information as the remaining age groups. It is followed by printed newspapers and magazines at 27%, while the Internet only recorded 16%. Other forms of information delivery were counted on by retirees nearly one-fifth of the time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... retirees nearly one-fifth of the time.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, third, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04186046512 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79478770052 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544186046512 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1972221329 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.444444444 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24373103567 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112520075898 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613266389331 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1643293748 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03238981283 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.