The charts give information about two genres of TV programmes watched by men and women and four different age groups in Australia.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two bar graphs illustrate the information about the terms of proportion of males, females and four various age groups who seen two several kinds of television sitcoms in Australia.
In overall, age group related to 45+ constitutes a major for watching both types of silver screen shows since others watched programmes in least amount. However, there are lots of transformation can be notice in the amount of two genders and given all age groups to watch idiot box telecasts.
With regards to an initial graph, in Australia people who are over 45 is most popular for seeing reality shows on televisions which accounted at three quarters followed by women (70%) and humans who between 35-44(70%). In contrast, a disparity of one in ten can be observed in percentage of males (40%) as well as stay two age groups (teens (50%) and adults (60%) for watching reality programmes.
The second graph proves that 25-34 age group masses accounted for above a third (35%) for watching Game shows and experienced a two-fold rise to seven in ten in people who are sharing 45+ age periods. Likewise, the percentage of watched Game programmes by men and women are finding 65 and three fifths respectively in specific region. Lastly, a half number of people who belongs to 16-24 periods watch game show on silver screen and a five times less decrease seen in the amount of 35-44 age groups in particular nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the least'.
Suggestion: in the least
...n shows since others watched programmes in least amount. However, there are lots of tran...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, lastly, likewise, second, third, well, in contrast, in particular, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1162.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86192468619 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58747963411 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602510460251 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 26.8488244622 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.25 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.875 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 5.23603664747 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213795053281 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102723708681 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503313801981 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14343808689 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486601080411 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.