The charts give information about world forest in five different regions Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The charts give information about world forest in five different regions. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts make comparisons the proportion of forest and timber of each region in 5 different areas.
Overall, forests in Africa account for the largest amount while the figure for Asia occupy the least.
The highest value can be seen in North America's timbers, while opposite is registered in the amount of timber in Africa.
In terms of forest, over half of all forest in the world is found in Africa and North America. African forests constituted vast majority in total global forests (27%), compared to 25% in forests of North America. 18% of the total global forests is distributed to European forests while the figure for South America occupy 16% in total forests. Only a fraction of total forests is allocated to Asia (14%).
The area with the lowest amount of timbers from all areas is Africa with a mere 9%, which is almost a third of that by North America. While European timbers constituted 20% in total, 23% of total is distributed to South America. Only a fraction of total global timbers is allocated to Asia

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7374301676 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41746503578 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480446927374 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.6148329265 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.8 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10586828301 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567759681258 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742530473171 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0773443532479 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.095537002038 0.0819641961636 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.