The charts show the amount and quality of water supplied to two regions of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
the charts compare the percentage of water distribution to the general public and degree of its cleanliness in Australia and SE Asia in 1990 and 2010.
Overall, the Australian water supply is more qualitative and available for more number of people than Asian. Australia and SE Asia are improving its water availability as well as supply, but SE Asia slightly reduces its quality level later.
According to the bar chart, the supply of water was for 80% of people in the year 1990 in Australia and below 40% of people are in reach of water in South-East Asia. After 20 years, in Australia, nearly one of ten people are added in water availability where SE doubles its ratio. Both regions are increasing water distribution until 1920.
From the next chart, the degree of hygiene of Australian water increased by a significant proportion of 5% earlier it was about 65%. In contrast, only 40% of water is clean in Asia in 1990, but after the gradual increase in water supply, it slightly reduces with a tiny proportion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the charts compare the percentage of water ...
^^^
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...percentage of water distribution to the general public and degree of its cleanliness in Austra...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, as for, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82954545455 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69677550799 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528409090909 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0915985437 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.25 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139065892484 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707282180497 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0183671896745 0.0843802449381 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.089894274398 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278090811275 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.