The charts show the amount and quality of water supplied to two regions of the world.
The provided bar graphhs illustrate the information about the quantity and cleanliness of water supplied to distinct countries of the world in year 1990 and 2010. The data has been calibrated in percentage.
Overall, it is worth mentionable that in the latter given year, almost entire population were enable to obtain the water supply and even Australia got the more clean water.
At a first glance, it can be observed that In 1990 , the whole population were consume 80% water while it was least obtain in South East Asia which was above 30%. Although, Australia were gain higher amount of water due to year 2010 which was approximately 100% whereas the people of South East Asia were able to obtain the water which was exactly 75%.
Moreover, people of Australia got the 70% quality of water in year 1990 whereas whole population of South East Asia were get 40% of cleanliness. Meanwhile, due to year 2010 , quality of water was increased which reach to above 80% in Australia while it was rapidly decreased in South East Asia thet was 35%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntionable that in the latter given year, almost entire population were enable to ...
^^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'enabled'.
Suggestion: enabled
...en year, almost entire population were enable to obtain the water supply and even Aus...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a first glance, it can be observed that In 1990 , the whole population were cons...
^^
Line 5, column 52, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...glance, it can be observed that In 1990 , the whole population were consume 80% w...
^^
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...ed that In 1990 , the whole population were consume 80% water while it was least ob...
^^^^
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'consumed'.
Suggestion: consumed
...at In 1990 , the whole population were consume 80% water while it was least obtain in ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...East Asia which was above 30%. Although, Australia were gain higher amount of wat...
^^
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...ich was above 30%. Although, Australia were gain higher amount of water due to year...
^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ater which was exactly 75%. Moreover, people of Australia got the 70% quality ...
^^
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...eas whole population of South East Asia were get 40% of cleanliness. Meanwhile, due ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'got', 'gotten'.
Suggestion: got; gotten
...hole population of South East Asia were get 40% of cleanliness. Meanwhile, due to y...
^^^
Line 7, column 174, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...cleanliness. Meanwhile, due to year 2010 , quality of water was increased which re...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82222222222 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49032059281 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522222222222 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7842902485 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 1.69756097561 707% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150742514305 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781518396004 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460045472808 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105507479383 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205005364134 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.