The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
The bar chart illustrates the average number of years males and females attended school. While the pie chart shows the different levels of education achieved by adults in Singapore between 2000 and 2010.
Overall, there was an increasing number of years in both males and females in the educating system during the period shown. It can also be seen that Singapore females always spent less time at school in comparison to their male counterparts. In addition, the level of education people was accomplishing had increased over the period.
According to the bar chart, in 2000, the number of years females attended school in 2008 which remained unchanged until 2008, and then rose to 8,9 years in 2010. In contrast, male citizens spent an average of 8,9 years in school, which rose considerably to almost 12 years in 2010.
As can be seen from the pie charts in 2000, almost one-third of Singapore’s population finish high school. The figures for those also only left school after receiving primary or secondary qualifications were quite high, at 25, 77%, and 26,3 % respectively. However, there was a significant change in 2010 when 30, 31% and 32, 93% of Singapore adults obtained the highest level as university and master degrees. Other qualifications accounted for a lower percentage at about 19%, 15%, and 2%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-28 | MinhDuong101104 | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-20 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-26 | rutvik6 | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-02 | Vuthungan | 73 | view |
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 78
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 78
- The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 Describe the main features of the figure 92
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports Why is it Is it a positive or negative development 78
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is in this case Is a positive or negative development 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, then, third, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1109.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0871559633 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75316339432 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600917431193 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.6705123948 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.818181818 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8181818182 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313631567567 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12312153028 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136712405715 0.0843802449381 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205807334713 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13135249866 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.