The charts show how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013

Essay topics:

The charts show how frequently people in the USA ate in fast-food restaurants between 2003 and 2013

The bar charts above representate the number of USA’s people consuming junkfoods in several times (2003, 2006, and 2013). Interestingly though, it is measured in percentage. At first glance, it was evident that the highest rise occured in citizens buying fast food once or twice a moth after dropped dramatically in 2006 while the inhabitants were never purchasing these foods remain constant.
Moving to a more detailed analysis concerning to the data of people gaining fast foods once a week, one time or twice a month, and several times weekly. However, the upper percentage reached by people who like to eat just one or two times per month, it was more than a third after declined quite drastically from 30% to 25% while the citizen buying this type of food once in every week reached the same amount in 2006 but fell into around 28%. Next, people loving to gain its food few times a week were achieving a fifth in 2006 yet declined approximately 5% to 15% almost the same with the initial number.
Turning to the data among people obtaining their fast foods several times yearly, every day, and never. The fast food which was gained by people a few times a year attained similarly percentage after 2003 for a mere 15%. In addition, the type of time from the customers paying their meals every day or never buying it had an identical percentage which was started from around 5% and the next time was slightly below it.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...ds several times yearly, every day, and never. The fast food which was gained by peop...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd the next time was slightly below it.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, similarly, third, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.708 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40834881195 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.9932740313 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.777777778 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7777777778 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174737145651 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896193576308 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703197963946 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134244211009 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437937837753 0.0819641961636 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.