The charts show the percentage of water used for different reasons in six areas of the world.
The given pie charts compare water consumption for three main motives in six different areas namely: North as well as South America, Europe, Africa, Central and South East Asia.
Overall, it is clear from the charts that Asian and African countries used more water for irrigation while North American and European countries used more water for their industrial needs.
Looking into details, a major proportion of water consumption observed in the agricultural sector and this was higher in African and Asian region than that of American and European parts. More than 80% water in Africa and Asia went in agricultural fields while this percentage was only 32% in Europe and 39% in North America. North America and Europe required more water in their industrial sector than that of Asian and African countries.
Moving towards, while half of the water was used in the industrial sector in North America and Europe, the percentage of that in African and Asian region ranged from 5% to 12% respectively. Interestingly, water utilisation in North as well as South America shows a contrasting scenario. Finally, more percentage of household water consumption could be observed in American and European continents than that of Asian and African regions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | Fedkin | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Fedkin | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | CharanpreetSingh | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | CharanpreetSingh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | CharanpreetSingh | 61 | view |
- The given chart gives information on the percentage of British people give money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 61
- Consumer goods have become the most important part of lives. Do you advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people think history has nothing or little to us but other think that styfyung past history can help us better understanding the present .discuss two views and give your opinion. 56
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Other thinks that it is better to work for different organisations. 61
- Do you support that nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent areas namely: North as well as South America, Europe, Africa, Central and Sou...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, look, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1055.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24875621891 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65870944678 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467661691542 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2816915423 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.875 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245125911107 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113288603289 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686958917614 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169862610327 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623121605745 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.