The pie charts give information about the production of electricity sources in four countries during the five years period from 2003 to 2008.
As can be seen from the charts, while the large amount of fossil fuel was produced in Viet Nam and India, hydro power was the most popular in Sweden and Moroco. However, the minority of Nuclear power was used in whole countries, during the period shown.
It is clear that over 80% of fossil fuel was produced in India which accounted for the highest percentage in comparison to three other countries, following by 56 % in Viet Nam. The opposite trend was true in Swenden and morocco at 4% and 5% respectively. The proportion of hydro power in Morocco was the highest at 95% that was approximate equal to the total of Viet Nam (44%) and Sweden (52%) while 4% of it was made in India.
In Morocco and Viet Nam, no nuclear power was produced and was just only 4% in India. Nevertheless the percentage of that source was the most vital in Sweden at 44%.
- The table below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980. 67
- The pie charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The table below shows show the number of cars made in Argentina, Australia and Thailand from 2003 to 2009. 78
- The chart below shows estimated world literacy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should write at least 150 words. 11
- The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 86, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...produced and was just only 4% in India. Nevertheless the percentage of that source was the m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, nevertheless, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54748603352 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44371201148 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536312849162 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2794923007 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.75 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.088854655811 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492758559157 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760865279707 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0840017701807 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0930845021662 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.