The bar chart give information about how much time people making a telephone call in Finland that including local line, national and international and mobiles during the period of nine years from 1995 to 2004.
As you can see from the chart, national and international and mobiles went up and the local line was the highest in the period shown.
the minutes of local lines have increased from 12000 million minutes in 1995 to approximately 17000 million minutes in 2001 which were twice as popular as national and mobiles. However, in 2002 the trend has decreased by nearly 1000 million minutes and the figure continued to plummet significantly from over 16000 million minutes to 12000 million minutes.
by contrast, the number of minutes in national and international climbed up gradually to over 1000 million minutes in 2004.
The data of mobiles, in 2005, it is the least popular in the both telephone calls; however, it was a significant increase form roughly 500 million minutes to nearly 1000 million minutes.
- The table below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980. 67
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods. 56
- The diagram describes the production of canned fruit. 61
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people.To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- Finland telephone calls report. -Syerapke- (rewrite)Prompt :The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in millions) of telephone calls in Finland, divided into three categories, from 1995-2004. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ne is the highest in the period shown. the minutes of local lines have increased f...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: By
...lion minutes to 12000 million minutes. by contrast, the number of minutes in nati...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04142011834 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63673047672 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532544378698 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.302640149 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.83333333333 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252642325556 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129930601485 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512256493325 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135381130544 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571585165921 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.