The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple-producing countries in 2009 and 2019, and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The supplied charts provide information on pineapple. The bar chart compares the amount of pineapple exported by three leading nations in this field in the two years (2009 and 2019), whilst the pie one demonstrates the proportion of cost involved in the process, ranging from production to distribution expenses.
Overall, it is evident that whereas there is an upward trend in international transport of the aforementioned fruit item in countries A and C, the opposite is true for country B. Furthermore, in the second graph, distribution and retail costs account for the majority of overall expenses.
In terms of the bar chart, in 2009, country B exported roughly 4,5 million tonnes of pineapple, ranking first among other nations at the same time. This was followed by countries A and C, with the statistics standing at approximately 1 million and 0,2 million respectively. Nevertheless, in 2019, it is noticeable that pineapple export of country A witnessed an exponential growth to slightly over 10 million tonnes. The figure for country B, on the contrary, dropped significantly to around 1,75 million tonnes.
Turning to the pie chart, a large percentage of total money was allocated to distribution and retail (at 35%), nearly seven times as much as the lowest figures which are 4% for export costs and 5% for production. In addition, the other stages appear to make up between 10% and 18% of the entire cost.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion respectively. Nevertheless, in 2019, it is noticeable that pineapple export o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, second, whereas, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1184.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05982905983 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98409351132 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606837606838 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8326032615 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.4 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220294118349 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817160059755 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063739273616 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125645746167 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699353610493 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.