The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple producing countries in 2009 and 2019 and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019

Essay topics:

The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple-producing countries in 2009 and 2019, and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019.

The bar chart depicts the aggregate number of pineapples tonnes exported by three countries that produced this type of fruit the most between 2009 and 2019, and the pie chart gives information on the factors that made up the cost of pineapples on the marketplace.

Overall, both countries A and C witnessed a rise in pineapple exports, whereas country B decreased significantly. Furthermore, considering the breakdown of the cost, distribution and retail accounts for the lion's share, as opposed to a small amount of money spent on exporting.

As per the bar chart, throughout the period, country A had a fivefold increase in terms of the amount of pineapple exported. Nevertheless, country B was the biggest exporter in 2009 but this changed ten years later when its export for pineapples decreased from over four tonnes to the vicinity of two tonnes. The export of pineapples in country C, however, only increased slightly over the course of ten years.

Regarding the pie chart, aside from distribution and retail price, profit also contributed to the large share of the cost, nearly reaching the 20% mark. Taxes also accounted for 16% for that matter. In addition, international transport and import licenses made up for 12% and 10%, respectively. Only a small amount of money was given to the producer and export costs.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ms of the amount of pineapple exported. Nevertheless, country B was the biggest ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, whereas, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1114.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08675799087 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87706745652 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570776255708 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1936652016 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.4 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356090679249 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126147527669 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115309409326 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219286980115 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128941041354 0.0819641961636 157% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.