People aim to achieve the balance between their work and lives but few people achieve it What are the causes of the problems How to overcome it

The world is constantly evolving in a dynamic way; as a result, people have to catch up with the erratic changes of society. Many possess the thoughts of achieving the work-life balance, however, only a small number of people have been able to maintain this sense of equilibrium. This could happen courtesy of a host of reasons, which will be further elucidated in this essay before drawing any further solution to this matter.

First and foremost, the failure in achieving the work-life balance is by virtue of the competitive labor market. To elaborate, the development in many aspects of workplaces has precipitated the demand for skillful and experienced employees. For example, some multinational enterprises might opt for someone who is well-rounded and possess a wide range of good virtues rather than those who lack the experience or skills needed. Hence, potential workers have to spend more time brushing up on their skills and cultivate their aptitude to increase the chance of getting hired, and those who pay more attention to recreational activities will likely be eliminated during the hiring process. By shedding light on this example, it is crystal clear that the high demand in choosing employees has been instilled in the mind of many individuals in search of a career that they have to trade the work-life balance for the prospect of getting a job. In order to mitigate this, people should be taught how to plan their future according to the anticipation of the labor market climate to maintain the balance between their work and lives.

Another major contribution to the imbalance of working and resting is the fear of having money setbacks seen in some individuals. It is highly probable that some employees fall prey to irrational fears of living in plights and predicaments. To specify, in many Asian countries, there is a ubiquitous social malady of normalizing overworking since it is commonly believed that working longer hours is synonymous with lessening the chance of being fired. This could be detrimental to the mental well-being of these employees and potentially causing distress for them. On this account, it is necessary that people have a confidant who would lend them an ear and help them to form up an outlet for negative emotions.

In conclusion, the root of work-life imbalance may stem from the erratic changes in the labor market and the social dogma that many people possess. Despite this, it can be mitigated by raising people’s awareness and having a confidante in one’s life. All things considered, this sense of equilibrium might not be a perpetual problem in the future if people have the ability to maintain it.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a dynamic way" with adverb for "dynamic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
The world is constantly evolving in a dynamic way; as a result, people have to catch up w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...ng the work-life balance, however, only a small number of people have been able to maintain this ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 715, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orm up an outlet for negative emotions. In conclusion, the root of work-life imb...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people have the ability to maintain it.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 41.998997996 171% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2236.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 441.0 315.596192385 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07029478458 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79144492822 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539682539683 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 698.4 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.1391006522 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.529411765 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9411764706 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47058823529 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198645580481 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658349527857 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617819622123 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119597702498 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328643123095 0.056905535591 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.