The Charts summarise the weight measurement of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.
The Charts illustrate the weight assessment of inhabitants in Charlestown in different years 1955, 2015.The data calibrated in percentage.
Have a look on 20 to 59, 70% ideal people were accounted in this age group and with the increasing of aging process it reduced with 40% while, there was a10% observe in 60-69.The measurements of overweight people were only one in ten in initial but marginal inclined till 30-40 near around 40%. It has followed by the obese and ideal, the first one youngest group following risining trend and started by 3% , till older it reached on three fifths percent in 2015 whereas, later was negligible age groups.
Moving to the other year 1955, younger who were 70% in ideal category however, it just upsurged with 10% from 30-49 on the other hand, older age groups kept on just under 60%.Surprisingly, difference of 40% could be noticed in underweight all ages. In this year less obese masses considered about 20%,30%.
overall, with the comparison of two years it can be accumulated significant rise in the number of obese people while, there was a general drop of underweight people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...arlestown in different years 1955, 2015.The data calibrated in percentage. Have a...
^^^
Line 2, column 176, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... while, there was a10% observe in 60-69.The measurements of overweight people were ...
^^^
Line 2, column 407, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...llowing risining trend and started by 3% , till older it reached on three fifths p...
^^
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Surprisingly
...older age groups kept on just under 60%.Surprisingly, difference of 40% could be noticed in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...obese masses considered about 20%,30%. overall, with the comparison of two years it ca...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... years it can be accumulated significant rise in the number of obese people while...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96276595745 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75478008253 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648936170213 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.0679714422 43.030603864 179% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.5 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3333333333 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 5.23603664747 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147351044815 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778896818445 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.097997762605 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108134624586 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107661549923 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.