The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The given bar charts compare the weight measurements across all the age-groups in Charlestown over a period of 60 years from 1955 to 2015.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that over the period as a whole, the percentage of obese and overweight surpassed the ideal and underweight. However, the majority of the ideal people were reported in the youngest group throughout the period.
According to the given illustration, whilst below 10% of obese were noticed in 1955 between the ages 40 to 69, the same went up dramatically to 60% in 60 to 69 group, 50%(50-59), a quarter in 40 to 49, 10%(30-39), and just 1% in 20-29 age-group. Further, at the most 1 in every 5 people were overweight in all the groups except only 1% in 20 to 29 age-group. However, with the passing years, age-groups 30-39, 40-49, and 60-69 grew rapidly close to 35% for the overweight category as against just 8%in the other two groups each.
Moreover, in the case of ideal and underweight people, whereas the latter witnessed a sharp plunge by 15% before acquiring the least of 1% for 30 to 59 age-groups, the former plummeted down by nearly 20% in the same age window. On the contrary, despite ideal and underweight fell below 5% and 10% in the aged category, the ideal group stayed stable at 70%, while the underweight observed a decline of 10% in the youngest group.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecline of 10% in the youngest group.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, moreover, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1143.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7625 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73274574477 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579166666667 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.981604548 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.875 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.058244319867 0.215688989381 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0379034483724 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604308511452 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0613432170622 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726674964194 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.