The bar chart provided compares three main exportations of Southland which are international tourism, meat products, and dairy products in 2000, 2018 and predicts the future tendency of these three exports in 2025.
Analysing the bar chart, it is apparent from the data supplied that Southland got the highest profits from exporting overseas tourism the in 2000 but in 2018, they concentrate on selling abroad dairy products and receive a large amount of money. It is then predicted that in 2025, international tourism once again will account for the highest financial gain in this area. Furthermore, the exportation of meat products always attributes to the lowest payback.
With regards to the international tourism profit, this area witnessed a steady rise of this exportation between 2000 and 2018 climbing from approximately 8 billion pounds in 2000 to steadily to about 9 billion pounds in 2018 before being predicted to stand at 10 billion pounds in 2025. As for the dairy products, at first in 2000, its interest constituted with 7 billion pounds before increase dramatically to approximately 10 billion in 2018 which is 1 billion higher than international tourism's profit. In 2025, its data is predicted to drop slightly to about 9.5 billion.
When it comes to the last exportation - meat products, it brings the lowest payback for Southland in both 2000 and 2018 accounting for 6 billion pounds in the first year before decreasing 0.5 billion during the following years and standing at 5.5 billion in 2018. Moreover, in 2025, Southland will see a drop in financial gain of this exportation attributing to 5 billion pounds.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, moreover, so, then, as for, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 266.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16917293233 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87639474093 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511278195489 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 374.4 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.9970337732 43.030603864 179% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.777777778 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5555555556 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120401916364 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648004778186 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436979568437 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947768230741 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447996849109 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.