The recent phenomena in the decision making strategy of higher management has triggered a debate among the corporate leaders on whether or not to consult the employees before taking any decision. Many believe that employees inclusion should be abstained unless the decision is made while others think brain storming with the employees strengthen the decision taking ability of the management. This essay will discuss how employee can facilitate the management in decision making time.
First of all, it is the employees who are working on the implementation of the idea. It enables them to have better understanding of the product or service they are working on. Their ideas and experience can help management to a great extend before reaching any conclusion. For example, in IT industry the feasibility, duration and efforts of the development of a product can be more accurately if provided by the development team.
Secondly, the involvement of the employees in decision making meetings makes them feel empower and make them feel motivated. It increases the productivity of the entire structure in an organization. Employees find themselves valued and respected in the work environment which is obviously great for any organization.
In conclusion, the involvement of the employees before making any key decision can help the organization to achieve success because of better joint collaboration. Thus, it is important for the corporate leaders to pay attention to their employee suggestion before arriving to any decision.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...a debate among the corporate leaders on whether or not to consult the employees before taking ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
... taking any decision. Many believe that employees inclusion should be abstained unless th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, then, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 3.97073170732 453% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45378151261 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07693869399 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550420168067 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 283.868780488 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7492331216 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.166666667 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193841776699 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672860123319 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518819981509 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109128526944 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573804575436 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.