diagram
The three plans illustrate the information about the changes in village of Meadowside and Fonton town in three different period 1962, 1985, and present. It can be say that major changes had been done in town and village.
Firstly, in 1962, both town and village were not connected. Also, Fonton town was situated at the west side with one railway path which was passing from northern to eastern direction. Moreover, Meadowside village was located at western side with one small road. Whereas, in 1985, the area of both village and town had been extended and small road was converted to big road. One more thing, three facilities were developed in village which was leisure complex, housing estate and super store.
Secondly, now village is converted to suburbs and both town and suburbs has been merged. Furthermore, railway line has been extended from center to western side also, one station is constructed. Additionally, business, park has been made at southern side and hotel at northern side.
Overall, area had been extended in 1985 while at present village and town is converted to one town with all kinds of basic facility.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-11 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
- two maps 11
- In the present era children are found to have fewer responsibilities than it used to be in the past time Some people consider it as positive development however some other people believe it to be a negative trend Discuss both the views and give your own o 67
- Nowadays some older people choose to live in retirement communities with other people rather than living with their adult children Is it a positive or negative development 54
- Process chart 73
- the advantages brought by the spread of english as a global language will outweigh the disadvantages to what extend do you agree or disagree with this view 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00529100529 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43960674781 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4268373124 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1818181818 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.