The diagram below shows a possible future means of home energy production
The graph illustrates the procedural stages of energy making for home use with waste as its principal source. With this self-produced energy, we do not, later on, have to buy conventional power for daily needs.
In the nutshell, the generation involves six primary sequences with the composting process as a starter and electricity storage as a closer prior to electricity distribution to houses for daily uses.
Three initial steps have to be carried out before the gas is ready to be combusted. First of all, leaves, foods, scraps, and water fill in a composting tank; However, the materials cannot exceed ¾ of the total tank volume. The mixture will allow a fermentation process to occur, thus resulting in methane gas used as a basic ingredient for the next steps. Then, the methane gas is passed through to an ample methane gas storage before being funnelled into a compressor.
In addition to the three earlier steps, the compressed methane gas, as a result of the previous compression stage, needs incinerating in a combustion engine to convert the methane into mechanical energy. Furthermore, compared to the previous energy conversion step, the next step has the same purpose, but it yields a different sort of energy. The conversion process, carried out in a generator, turns the mechanical to electrical energy and the energy has to be stored first in a battery. Finally, the energy can be distributed to electrify houses for home use.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, then, thus, as to, in addition, sort of, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 240.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05416666667 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86276078385 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0936919257 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.272727273 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6363636364 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0685343693592 0.244688304435 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0322802078807 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458278040556 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0407098680255 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431167297746 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.