The diagram belows show stages in the development of simple cooking equipment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant

Essay topics:

The diagram belows show stages in the development of simple cooking equipment.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.

The diagram illustrates the process of improving cooking utensils. It is indicated that there are three distinct stages from the process, from the initially simple to eventually complicated equipment.

At the first stage in the development of cooking equipment, there is only a simple cooking pot balanced on many stones over many twigs and grass. Moving to the second image, it shows how the equipment has improved by building a shield made of clay around the stone to protect the fire. There is also a hole that is used to put the sticks, as well as, twigs inside the shield.

At the final stage of the diagram, the equipment is more complex. The clay shied is replaced with a metal one combined with a door in order for the entry of air and the flow out of ash. Above the shield, there is an equipment used to support port with handles, as well as clay lining surrounds the utensils. In the bottom, there is a grate for putting charcoal inside.

In fact, cooking equipment has developed significantly to a more complicated level.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-07-28 levanhoan123 view
2022-07-28 levanhoan123 view
2022-07-28 levanhoan123 view
2022-03-13 namviet 78 view
2021-10-18 Khanhu010101 78 view
Essays by user lunaire_anne :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, well, in fact, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73626373626 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55798590163 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2857795172 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184164018075 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732575139483 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615477610048 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115245019544 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291693630473 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.