The diagram opposite shows how a thermos flask works.
A breakdown of some parts of thermos flask and how it works is presented in a picture.
Clearly, thermos flask has outer and inner parts relating and supporting each other with a simple design. The main function of this equipment is to support the hot water having stable temperature for some hours.
The height of thermos flask is 30 to 40 cm and the structure is divided into some parts. It starts from the cup made of plastic, and this cup can be used for drink. Right below this part, there is a plastic cap to keep the water spilled out, and it allows some heat released. The upper part of the bottle with slender shape or called the neck bottle is also covered by a light material such as plastic and metal as well as the outer case.
Turning to the inside part, the vacuüm flask shields the hot liquid in a silvered glass. The glass is an insulator with poor conductor and has less infrared radiation. The lower part is an insulated support maintaining the temperature of the hot water stable within several hours.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-11 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
- Some people find history a fascinating subject. Others say it is dull and has no place in modern life. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- The diagram opposite shows how a thermos flask works 93
- The charts below show the number of French adults whose parents spoke a French regional language to them when they were children and the number who speak a French regional language to their own children 71
- Some people argue that space exploration had more to do with national pride than international effort.To what extent do you agree with this?How do you think space exploration will change in the future? 73
- The graph below shows the percentage change in places where students lived over five decades 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52688172043 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29123107833 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575268817204 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8704838661 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.2 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114635744032 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549772587387 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779285991775 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0987559977055 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809916509473 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.