The picture illustrates the steps of cloning a sheep embryo.
Overall, the process needs three female sheep, and DNA of a somatic cell of a sheep is in cooperated in to an ovum of another sheep, which is then allowed to grow in the womb of third female sheep in to a cloned lamb.
First, a body cell is taken out from the sheep A, and the genetic material is then extracted. At the same time, a genital cell is obtained from the sheep B, from which the entire nucleus is removed. Afterwards, the DNA from sheep A is introduced in to the empty ova of the sheep B to form a new cell. After being fused, the new cell is allowed to proliferate in order to create an embryo in vitro. Once the embryo is formed, it is deposited in the uterus of sheep C in view of maturing it in to a lamb. Having been completed the in vivo period, the lamb, which is a clone of sheep A, is then delivered. The resulting lamb is phenotypically exactly similar to sheep A, from which it receives all the genetic details.
- Disabled people thought being the citizens of country have always remained a subject of sympathy instead of gaining equal states in the society what should government do to improve their condition 95
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extend do you agree or disagree with 67
- The diagram shows the process by which sheep embryis are cloned 61
- The diagram below shows the water cycle which is the continuous movement of water on above and below the surface of the Earth
- In many parts of the world families were larger in the past because people had more children Do you think there were more advantages or disadvantages to being part of a large family in the past Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.22395833333 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44163089244 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479166666667 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4285683125 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1111111111 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284491720447 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129779104177 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823520100707 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224178484674 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471871142574 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.2 11.4140731707 63% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.