The diagram shows relationships amone a number of different types of languagess
The diagram displays both the similarity and connection between variety of languages. For the reason of clear explanation, it is provided with an examples.
In overall, five different types of languages (logographic, Abjad, Abjuda, Alphabetic and Syllabic) compared each other by their writing structures. Whilst, there was dissimilar style in each system, it is observed that there was common usage of consonant in Abjad, Abjuda and alphabetic. Despite the usage of consonant, the common usage undetected in logographic and Syllabic style.
Furthermore, it is making Logographic system odd because of mere word expresses character. For instances, both Chinese and Japanese using same system in speaking language. Another diverse system is Syllabic, which also consist of only syllable. Familiar example is Japanese Kana that is consist one syllable.
There upon, Abjuda considered as common writing system by its usage of consonant. Nevertheless, the diagram highlighting that, the language distinguished by character structure not only one but also two consistent compared with other languages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an example' or simply 'examples'?
Suggestion: an example; examples
... clear explanation, it is provided with an examples. In overall, five different types of l...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'consisted'.
Suggestion: consisted
...miliar example is Japanese Kana that is consist one syllable. There upon, Abjuda consi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77777777778 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97220779967 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623456790123 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.45097560976 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5913845534 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0909090909 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7272727273 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0552541874459 0.215688989381 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0192366434743 0.103423049105 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334176962351 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0334274147354 0.15604864568 21% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199424851309 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.89 61.2550243902 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.65 11.4140731707 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.06136585366 128% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.