Rembrandts painting origin, whether it is actually rembrandts or not?
From the beginning to the end, passage and lecture discussing about the most famous painter Rembrandt's painting, whether the paint is actually painted by him or not. However, lecturer explaining conclusion made by painting expert that the painting is indeed Rembrandts.
First, the passage stated that there was unrelavent clothing attitude in painting which lead to conclusion that the paint might not Rembrandt's, which was in stark contrast to and refuted by the lecture. The lecturer states that unrelevant luxurious fur was painted hundred years after to refreshen the painting.
Secondly, according to the passage, there was unfitted light in woman' face while there was light absorbing dark fur. However, this theory is strongly dismissed by the lecturer. Before dark fur was written, there was light cloth and the cloth reflected color and illuminated the face.
Lastly, passage posited that even painting panel were different from Rembrandts, the lecture disagreed. Regardless, lecturer made point that several pieces of wood glued to make painting heavy after few years later. Moreover, some part of wood pieces were as same as Rembrandt's original painting.
Given the points clarified by the lecturer, there is no doubt that the passage has been proven untrue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 266, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...at unrelevant luxurious fur was painted hundred years after to refreshen the painting. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1075.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 199.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40201005025 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53413851908 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587939698492 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9580955468 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7272727273 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230635415795 0.272083759551 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831834356215 0.0996497079465 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104659267424 0.0662205650399 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117321719443 0.162205337803 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124726263611 0.0443174109184 281% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.