Consequences of deforestation is explaned by flow chart.
Summerize information by selecting and reporting main feature.
Consequences due to deforestation is explained by the flow chart with a detailed logical order. It is observed that clear-cutting of the forest is divided into four categories by each leads to critical issues such as flooding and decreased biodiversity. However, only one category that leads to flooding is heavy logging equipment that compresses the soil, and because hardened solid rainwater is not able to absorbed by the soil and it runs off.
Another three categories arrowed into pioneer species migration and vegetation degrading process which led to danger in biodiversity. Furthermore, all three categories head pioneer species to migrate and degrade in vegetation following danger in biodiversity.
It is true that a decreased amount of root (role of hold surface soil in place) is observed. The act of deforestation, this act led to topsoil corrosion. Then higher chances of forest fires made both from an accident or deliberate act. This process brings forest destroyed waste wood from logging. Micro-organisms, unfortunately, lost supply of feeding organisms because of the former process. Also, decreased moisture when it upset plants, returning process stopped and then moisture changes precipitation amount by the negative way which contributes land to be extremely dry and directed to drought.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, so, then, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56862745098 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1283882055 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637254901961 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.2068765452 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.272727273 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5454545455 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 5.23603664747 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0650855580971 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0304705221207 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.096356251396 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0460664325781 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651477737221 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.