The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the
redevelopment of an art gallery.
The given diagram details the current structural layout of the art gallery and envisages the future plans for the same.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the entire plan is predicted to undergo changes resulting in an extended art area, an improved infrastructure, and additional facilities followed next by a changed entry point.
According to the given illustration, the present floor plan has a small area assigned for the permanent exhibition space with adjoining temporary spaces towards the right extension. However, as per the proposed plan, the temporary area will be replaced by the permanent exhibition space leading to a vastly expanded area.
Furthermore, at present, the lobby to the east of the exhibition space opens up for the main entrance with an attached office to its left. In the future, both will be demolished to construct a new educational area and a store. Moreover, the entrance will be shifted to the north end of the enlarged exhibition space that will open up from the Parkinson court, which will remain unchanged. Also, the free space to the western end of the exhibition space is planned to be renovated into a special exhibition space with a connected storeroom to its north end.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15609756098 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83126926718 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575609756098 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1356870816 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.125 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180121237579 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857312473338 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814862410088 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137987716458 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081234511791 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.