The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of
different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006.
The given bar chart details the statistical report showing how much money(in billion dollars) is made from the sale of four different digital games over a period of 6 years from 2000 to 20006.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that over the period as a whole, the handheld games continued to lead the chart, despite the emergence of other popular mobile and online games. However, the console business witnessed a reverse trend.
According to the given illustration, to begin with, console games stood at half of the sales recorded from the handheld ones(nearly $12 billion). Moving on, although online and mobile games entered the market at only $2 billion sales in 2002, the handheld kept on rising significantly as compared to the console which fell slightly by a billion dollar.
Furthermore, in 2004, whilst the mobile and online games grew to reach on par with the console sales, the handheld rose dramatically, reaching at $15 billion. Thereafter, whereas the console games plummeted drastically by 50% of its initial value, the handheld sky-rocketed to a peak of $18 billion by the year-end. By contrast, the online games surpassed the mobile ones by nearly $2 billion during this period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... mobile games entered the market at only billion sales in 2002, the handheld kept...
^^
Line 7, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ames surpassed the mobile ones by nearly billion during this period.
^^
Line 7, column 380, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...es surpassed the mobile ones by nearly billion during this period.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, so, whereas, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1608040201 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69307354805 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592964824121 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5555244145 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.375 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237994361803 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103794403537 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896535517268 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154190217655 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103525535311 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.