The diagrams below show the campus of Riversdale University in 1993 and in 2010.
The maps illustrate the changes in the Riversdale University campus between 1973 and 2010.
Overall, the Riversdale University was divided into 2 areas by a river that runs through from the north to the south and had a bridge over the river to connect both sides. It is noticeable that the university had significant developments in building structures and facilities with the addition of a future plan to built a building.
In the south-west, the nature reserve was completely cleared to make way for the second car park, a tram stop and the site for the proposed medical school building in 2019. The student union office was knocked down to make room for the expansion of the first car park. However, it was relocated to the north of the sports center and its size was bigger as compared before.
There was an extension added to the north side of the law building so that it can house the social sciences department. Similarly, the north end of the library was extended to the west where the social science used to be. The fine art building was repurposed to information sciences while the remaining structures, as well as the sports field and ovals, remained undeveloped.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...e sports center and its size was bigger as compared before. There was an extens...
^^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sciences'' or 'science's'?
Suggestion: sciences'; science's
...uilding so that it can house the social sciences department. Similarly, the north end of...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 331, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...he remaining structures, as well as the sports field and ovals, remained undeveloped.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, similarly, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83251231527 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66483796001 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.189638698 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0923118914304 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494383615184 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968210787793 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101218293241 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127146116584 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.