The diagram compare the significant cause of boys and girls to select to do their worked and the hours from home in the year of 2019.
Overall, what stand out is that the bar chat witnessed the main reason for doing jobs from home is that the males save more money and they were more productive as compare to females, while, females was more childcare. In table can be seen that the highest percentage of men work over 30 hours in 7 days whereas women did least percent of work per week.
In regards with, 45% of males save their money when they did work from home and females was 42%, moreover, another reason for working from home is that men were more productive than females which was 24 % male while only 11 % was females but the percentage of males was significantly lower in easier childcare which was merely 4% while the females was more childcare when they did worked from home.
In contrast, just 3% of boys did under 10 hours job from home per week and the female’s ratio was far higher which 74% was. However 22% females and 16% of males did 10 to 30 hours work in 7 day, although 81 percent of men did over 30 hours of work per week which is much higher than women and the opposite women was just 6%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'compares'.
Suggestion: compares
The diagram compare the significant cause of boys and girls...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'work'
Suggestion: work
...emales was more childcare when they did worked from home. In contrast, just 3% of b...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...care when they did worked from home. In contrast, just 3% of boys did under 10 ...
^^
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...e’s ratio was far higher which 74% was. However 22% females and 16% of males did 10 to ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.34934497817 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.06960818744 2.65546596893 78% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489082969432 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.8286466329 43.030603864 220% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 166.0 112.824112599 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.1666666667 22.9334400587 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284666154126 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162455554399 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681572170723 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208265463207 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053721208042 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.2329268293 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.29 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.54 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.