The diagrams below show the main reasons workers chose to work from home and the hours males and females worked at home for the year 2019.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagrams depict the main reasons of male and females to work from home and the hours of work of per week from their home in the year of 2019.
Overall, in the bar chart illustrates that there were the main reason to worked at home was that to save money and in the table shows males had worked for more hours than female.
In the first graph, we can see that, only 4% men was interested in doing task from home for the reason of childcare, while 26% women only want to work from home, to make the easier their children nurture. However, 11% female employees choice to worked at home for productive purpose, on the other hand, due to productive reason male employees worked at home which stand at 24%. Most of the employees ( men and women) worked from home and the main purpose was saving money which were respectively 45% and 42%.
The table of data about hours worked at home of workers, where 74% women worked under 10 hours of per week, in opposite only 3% men had to worked. Contrast by, 81% male employees worked for over 30 hours per week while 6% women did their task for over 30 hours. 10 to 30 hours of every week, both employees did worked from home respectively 16% and 22%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich stand at 24%. Most of the employees men and women worked from home and the m...
^^
Line 4, column 311, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'work'
Suggestion: work
...hours of every week, both employees did worked from home respectively 16% and 22%.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.34080717489 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.05095067733 2.65546596893 77% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47533632287 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.3247359786 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.875 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.454479101117 0.215688989381 211% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.241177910327 0.103423049105 233% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11804071294 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.344602299427 0.15604864568 221% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103647231325 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.19 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.