The given vertical chart illustrates the data about the main factors for working from home and tabular graph depicts the information regarding how many hours they spend on work in 2019.
Overall, it can be seen that, both men and women were doing work from home to save money and the least priority of work from home was easier childcare for men.
It is crystal clear that, 45% of males and 42% of females were doing work from home to save money respectively. Whereas, 24% of men were seem working from home for more productive as compared to women which was 13%. Although, merely 4% of males were prefer to work from home for easier childcare while, the percentage of females in easier childcare was higher which was 25%.
Moving further, the highest percentage of females were spend maximum hours of work under 10 per week. On the contrary, 10 to 30 hours worked from home was males by 16% and 22% of females respectively. Over 30 per week, the proportion of men was highest rather than women.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'seemed'.
Suggestion: seemed
... respectively. Whereas, 24% of men were seem working from home for more productive a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'preferred'.
Suggestion: preferred
... 13%. Although, merely 4% of males were prefer to work from home for easier childcare ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oving further, the highest percentage of females were spend maximum hours of work...
^^
Line 7, column 57, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...the highest percentage of females were spend maximum hours of work under 10 per week...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, whereas, while, in fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64606741573 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29238955403 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52808988764 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7142683435 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.375 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317487384958 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162715449635 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804748808101 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216997500834 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439522538019 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.