The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024.
The provided two pictures compare the layout of an unnamed school as it was in 2002 with proposed site design for the year 2024.
Overall, it is evident that one of the remarkable developments for 2025 is the introduction of a new school building, which also means that the school will then be able to accommodate a considerably larger number of students.
Looking at the details, in 2004, there were 600 students attending the school. Furthermore, two school buildings which are located to the north were separated by a path running from the main entrance to the sports field. Nevertheless, in 2021, it is expected that there will be 1000 students, and the plan involves the addition of a third building on the original site of the sports field. Also noteworthy is that two original buildings are proposed to be connected, whereas a shorter path will link all three buildings.
It is interesting to note that a smaller sports field will be erected to the west of the school, replacing trees which were scattered around. One further notable change is that a road is planned to be built, going through the main entrance to a second car park on the right of the third building. Finally, no changes will be made to the original car park and the main entrance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... the original site of the sports field. Also noteworthy is that two original buildin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, look, nevertheless, second, so, then, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73636363636 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65278584271 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9920627421 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.777777778 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237852834865 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966891658564 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659419273782 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151937951012 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521493239511 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.