The diagrams below show UK students' responses to the question of to what extent would they describe themselves as financially organised.
The pie chart enumerates the information regarding the amount of uk students who replies the query about managing finance while tabular chart depicts the percentage of people who organised from different age group.
It is vivid, the first illustration articulates about the highest proportion of the students who respond around 55℅ there were able to manage their finance fairly and 20℅ of the respondent said, but they were not able to organise well. Similarly, the lower 4% of pupils were not organised their finance where as the 21% of students were better in organising the finance.
Heading toward, the second illustration tells us the 18 percent of respondents who were aged up to 22 years were able to answer in well manner similarly, the students who aged between 23 to 25 years replied the questions well and who pupils over 26 years up to 35 percent organised well.
Overall, the first illustration enumerates the students who were able to reply in fairly manner those were considered better in managing finance and from second chart depicts the who respondents from the age group of 26 years, made their performance better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...pupils were not organised their finance where as the 21% of students were better in orga...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, second, similarly, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07407407407 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62666307709 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507936507937 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.8821742027 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 191.8 112.824112599 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.8 22.9334400587 165% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4 5.23603664747 218% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0533317122735 0.215688989381 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357562166542 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0105817882385 0.0843802449381 13% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0373878577491 0.15604864568 24% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.011827828794 0.0819641961636 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.3 13.2329268293 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 10.3012195122 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.