Some people believe when famous people support international aid, it makes the general public think about it. Others think they make the problem less important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Innumerable people hold a perspective that a well-known people or film stars is playing a major role to support the global aid organizations just to get the public awareness while others asserts that this sort of activity will downplay the numerous significant problems. So this essay will enumerate the both reasons in detail and I will enunciate my personal opinion regarding this in forth coming paragraphs.
In first view, many insignificant event lives of celebrities making headlines of front page of newspaper which people leads to highly ignoring news about them in reality, when some outrageous outfit is worn by some idle could be a headlines of many newspapers. Furthermore, numerous celebrities tend to contribute about 10 lakhs rupees in many orphanages, just to obtain the more fame from public which becomes a sort of trade for journalists to write their blogs on them in internet or social websites. So this types of activities makes the people to think wrong about those renowned people and having misconception about them.
In second view, many communities are hectic in their daily routines and people who are well earnest even their salary is not much tenable to acquire their requirements of poor people. so that is why famous take the first stand to demonstrate their selves for contribution and it is evident, the work of the people to make unnecessary rumors of them also it is indisputable, those who are belongs to the richest families often donates a much more money as compare to famous people do, also those got the same perspective to reduce the poverty in their country but they never tend to disclose their names at any cost.
To conclude with, there are certain valid argument to the contrary in my personal belief that the impact of the famous people brings positive changes in amongst those global aid organization what that they always tend to donate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-05 | Kamaldeep | 84 | view |
| 2015-03-25 | MisterWandering | 90 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The role of prisons should be to punish criminals who have committed serious crimes. Training courses and education offered to prisoners are a waste of taxpayer’s money. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of 67
- The diagrams below show UK students' responses to the question of to what extent would they describe themselves as financially organised. 56
- Many people believe that women make better parents than men and that is why they have the greater role in raising children in most societies. Others claim that men are just as good as women at parenting 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 352, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...asons in detail and I will enunciate my personal opinion regarding this in forth coming paragrap...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 230, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a headline' or simply 'headlines'?
Suggestion: a headline; headlines
...us outfit is worn by some idle could be a headlines of many newspapers. Furthermore, numero...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...uire their requirements of poor people. so that is why famous take the first stand...
^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... of them also it is indisputable, those who are belongs to the richest families often d...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, regarding, second, so, well, while, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99050632911 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69353250751 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591772151899 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 20.2975951904 192% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.8636988722 49.4020404114 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 197.125 106.682146367 185% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.5 20.7667163134 190% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24900333427 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105522747447 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656929755271 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131491855636 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437276880814 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.8 13.0946893788 166% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.89 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.3001002004 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.1190380762 174% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.